Ekaterina Makarova (1996) vs Selena Janicijevic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Makarova's recent second serve win rate is 37.5%, while Janicijevic's is slightly higher at 38.95%. Could this minor edge influence the outcome?
• When challenged to return their opponent's second serve, Makarova leads with 47.98% won, narrowly surpassing Janicijevic's 47.39%.
• On returning first serves, Makarova again outperforms with 39.9% to Janicijevic's 34.31%, offering her a competitive advantage.
• Under pressure, Janicijevic shows resilience by saving 47.32% of breakpoints against her, compared to Makarova's 40.27%.
• Makarova's overall winning rate in the past year stands at 48.24%, notably higher than Janicijevic's 38.89%. Does this suggest a stronger contender?
• Both players favor different surfaces: Makarova excels on Hard courts, while Janicijevic has her best record on Clay.
• Makarova has fared better in their direct encounters, claiming 2 out of 3 matches. In sets, she leads with 4 to Janicijevic's 3.
• If the match proceeds to a deciding set, Makarova has a 53% winning record in such instances, overshadowing Janicijevic's 39% over the last year.
• As for breakpoint conversion, Makarova currently has an advantage, capitalizing on 41.85% of opportunities compared to Janicijevic's 36.48%.
• Looking at opponent quality, Janicijevic has faced tougher competition on average, with her opponents ranked at 260.54 compared to Makarova's 369.33.

Editorial Prediction (May 13, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing recent trends, Makarova's slight edge in second serve performance suggests a marginal advantage. Her capability to return serves effectively, especially on the first serve, indicates she might manage to apply more pressure during the match.

While Janicijevic demonstrates commendable breakpoint saving abilities, Makarova's superior performance in direct head-to-head encounters and overall higher win rate gives her a reliable track record against this specific opponent.

Given Makarova's historical dominance in deciding sets and her advantageous breakpoint conversion rate, she appears better equipped to capitalize on critical moments in the match.

These factors collectively lean towards a prediction in favor of Makarova as the most likely winner in their upcoming matchup, especially with her past successes and form during pressured situations.